Sterling Institute Logo Corporate Overview

sidebarblank.jpg (693 bytes)Search Our Site for Specific InformationSend an E-Mail to Sterling Institute

View Sterling Institute's Corporate Overview SectionView Sterling Institute's Training Systems Group SectionView Sterling Institute's Sales Effectiveness Group SectionView Sterling Institute's Government Services Group Section

What We Do

Over Thirty Years of Innovation

How We Can Help

Focused On Our Customers

Where We Fit in the Training & Development Marketplace

Core Competencies

Our Approach to Training and Development

Our Library of Training Programs

Corporate Headquarters

Distributors Wanted

The Training Systems Model

Design and Develop

In this phase, we take what we have learned to design and develop an integrated training solution to close the performance gap. The first product of this phase is clear and concise set of performance objectives. The behaviors and competencies described in the objectives will be observable and measurable. These objectives will tell you what you can expect your people to do differently when they leave the training experience.

Next, we provide a program design. This serves as a blueprint for the program. It describes the content to be covered and the methodology to be used. Furthermore, it will explains how our six basic beliefs of program design are to be executed. These tenets of our program methodology are:

1. Relevance: We are prepared to tailor make our programs in ways that facilitate a bridge from what is presented in the classroom to the application of the course back on the job. We can custom design case studies, role plays, simulations, assessment instruments and application exercises to ensure that your participants regard what is presented as highly relevant to their job responsibilities. We are skilled in positioning important competencies and practices within the context of the business environment so that program participants understand the relevance of what is presented and see how it can be applied to their responsibilities back on the job.

2. A Self-Directed Development Process: We believe that only those program participants who take primary responsibility for their own development are likely to acquire the knowledge, skills, and experience they need to increase their effectiveness and improve the performance of their organizations.

Self-directed development, however, cannot be forced. Participants must recognize a need to change their practices and must decide for themselves that they want to change them. It is for these reasons that a hallmark of our methodology is the use of diagnostic instruments, whether they be self-assessment guides or survey feedback instruments. These diagnostic tools give participants an opportunity to assess their effectiveness in the areas related to the program objectives. The assessments give them the opportunity to discover for themselves the opportunities they have to increase their effectiveness and improve performance back on the job. As a result of their own analysis, participants begin to recognize the need for change and take an important step on the road toward self-directed development.

3. Skill Development/Acquisition: We recognize that in order to help people behave differently when they return to work it is important to give them the opportunity to practice the skills they need in the risk free environment of a seminar. We break the desired behaviors into small, easily learned skill sets that the participants then practice in structured exercises and role-plays. They then practice all the skill sets together by applying them to a real life situation that represents an improvement opportunity for them back on the job. This enables them to then transfer the desired behaviors from the seminar back to their work place so that important organizational objectives can be achieved.

4. Top-Down Direction: We believe that our central role is to design training programs in order to support the achievement of organizational goals for which senior management is held accountable. This means that the performance objectives, program activities, and support and reinforcement systems that are prepared around our training programs must be designed toward this end. With senior management as the ultimate client of any training initiative, a top-down program design will focus on the objectives that are critical for them to achieve, thereby effectively positioning training and development as an important support function and ensuring their commitment and support for the implementation and follow-up of the training.

5. Application: Our experience has shown that training programs must help participants identify specific actions to take when they are back on-the-job, otherwise, little or no real development takes place. All of our programs assist participants to prepare comprehensive action plans that describe the specific steps they will take to achieve their business objectives and improve their effectiveness back on the job.

6. An Integrated Experience: We have found that by training multiple levels of an organization we are better able to facilitate organizational change and ensure the successful implementation of action plans back on-the-job. An integrated approach ensures that multiple levels of the organization understand the concepts presented and are prepared to provide guidance to their people when they return to work. An integrated training approach better enables people at various levels of the organization to carry out important performance improvement plans and achieve their common objectives. This organizational focus further allows for the tracking and measurement of performance improvement plans over time.

Introduction

Training
Systems Model

Diagnose

Management
Support and
Reinforcement

Design and
Develop

Implement and
Follow-Up

Evaluate

Summary

 

Return to Top of Page

 

Home || Corporate Overview || Training Systems Group || Sales Effectiveness Group || Government Services Group

 

Website Copyright © 1998-2007 by Sterling Institute, Inc.  All rights reserved.