Sterling Institute Logo Corporate Overview

sidebarblank.jpg (693 bytes)Search Our Site for Specific InformationSend an E-Mail to Sterling Institute

View Sterling Institute's Corporate Overview SectionView Sterling Institute's Training Systems Group SectionView Sterling Institute's Sales Effectiveness Group SectionView Sterling Institute's Government Services Group Section

What We Do

Over Thirty Years of Innovation

How We Can Help

Focused On Our Customers

Where We Fit in the Training & Development Marketplace

Core Competencies

Our Approach to Training and Development

Our Library of Training Programs

Corporate Headquarters

Distributors Wanted

Management On The Line:
Selling & Sales Management In Action

Year 2 Data

Did it make a difference? If one is to compare the Year 1 and Year 2 MPS results the answer is a very clear "yes." The comparison scores for Year 1 and Year 2, shown in Table 1, indicate that management actively addressed the concerns of the sales staff.

The group average scores for Year 2 were much higher, reflecting a more satisfied and productive sales force. All six of the survey dimensions showed significant increases.

Table 1

Group Comparison Score Year 1/Year 2

Dimension

Year 1

Year 2

Change

Performance
Expectations

13.25

15.39

2.14

Effective Authority

12.39

15.71

3.32

Teamwork

12.15

15.78

3.63

Performance
Evaluation

11.42

13.63

2.21

Rewards & Recognition

14.23

17.48

3.25

Responsibility for
Results

15.05

17.59

2.54

TOTAL

78.49

95.58

17.09

Only three of the forty-eight items on the survey did not increase. The dimensions which showed the greatest increase were; Rewards and Recognition, Teamwork and Effective Authority, indicating that senior management had been successful in creating an environment which encouraged and enabled subordinates to utilize their capabilities and to feel part of an effective team. This was substantiated by the comments of both the sales managers and the sales representatives to the consultants.

When viewed in relation to the Year 1 scores, it is apparent that not only was there great improvement, but that the improvement was in areas (Teamwork, Effective Authority, Rewards and Recognition) which led to a better motivated and more productive sales force. A strong and unambiguous message was sent that management was concerned and willing to address the issues facing the division.

Did the improvement in survey scores make any difference in the bottom line? Did sales improve? Again, if one compares the data, the answer is a very clear "yes." Sales improved on a year to year basis. While the MPS cannot assume all of the credit, it was felt by everyone involved that it contributed to the improvement.

Introduction

The
Environment

Management
Practices
Survey

The Process

Follow-Up

Year 2 Data

Year 3 Data

Summary

 

Return to Top of Page

 

Home || Corporate Overview || Training Systems Group || Sales Effectiveness Group || Government Services Group

 

Website Copyright © 1998-2007 by Sterling Institute, Inc.  All rights reserved.