Sterling Institute Logo Corporate Overview

sidebarblank.jpg (693 bytes)Search Our Site for Specific InformationSend an E-Mail to Sterling Institute

View Sterling Institute's Corporate Overview SectionView Sterling Institute's Training Systems Group SectionView Sterling Institute's Sales Effectiveness Group SectionView Sterling Institute's Government Services Group Section

What We Do

Over Thirty Years of Innovation

How We Can Help

Focused On Our Customers

Where We Fit in the Training & Development Marketplace

Core Competencies

Our Approach to Training and Development

Our Library of Training Programs

Corporate Headquarters

Distributors Wanted

Measurable Performance Improvement

Measuring Performance Improvement

The third purpose of evaluations is to measure the extent to which performance has improved and results have been achieved. These evaluations can usually best be made if participants have very specific improvement objectives and have prepared comprehensive action plans during the seminar. The development of targeted performance improvement plans provides an important opportunity to document the tangible results that training has contributed to the organization.

In order to document meaningful improvements in individual and organizational performance, a number of important follow-up steps must be taken. Without an effective post-program support and follow-up effort, the implementation of the participants' action plans may be left up to chance.

Therefore, two to four weeks following the seminar, participants should either attend a one-half day follow-up action planning session or complete a follow-up questionnaire that evaluates the extent to which they have made progress in implementing their plans, the degree to which their immediate supervisor has provided assistance, and the level of support they have given their people who have attended the seminar.

Conducting follow-up action planning sessions signals to participants that the organization is placing a priority on implementing the action plans. These follow-up efforts give participants an opportunity to:

improve or extend their action plans;

compare their progress with that of their peers;

review the obstacles they have encountered and
identify ways to overcome them;

learn about the successful steps taken by others
that can be incorporated into their plans; and

work jointly with their peers on plans whose
objectives require collaborative effort.

If for reasons of logistics a follow-up questionnaire is all that is administered, it is recommended that the questionnaire be distributed and evaluated by the management level that is one level higher than the most senior level attending the program. In this way, direct action can be taken by line management to ensure that real progress is made in implementing the action plans. It is for this reason that it is essential to get senior management support for training. If the programs support the achievement of their strategic and operating objectives, senior management will be more interested in following up to ensure that plans are implemented and results measured.

Depending on the objectives of the program, the final results of action plans should be measured three to six months following the seminar. It is important to let participants know that management will review the results of their plans. In that way, participants are stimulated to implement their plans and will look forward to measuring the extent to which they are able to make the improvements that they intended to.

The action planning process can be tied into a performance appraisal system, thereby formalizing this planning, implementation and review effort. Or follow-up seminars can be scheduled in which participants report on the results they have been able to obtain from their action plans. In these follow-up programs, participants should be asked to prepare presentations of the specific results they have achieved, so that everyone gets direct exposure to creative solutions to common problems as well as an opportunity to identify ways to overcome obstacles. After evaluating the results of their action plans, participants can use the feedback they have received from their peers to prepare additional action plans.

Demonstrating results through training is a comprehensive effort; one that requires that care be taken during the needs assessment, program design and program implementation phases of the training process. If care is taken, then the results of the evaluations will be positive.

Program evaluations help measure the effectiveness of the training process so that programs can be revised and improved. They also help measure the extent to which real behavioral change occurred as a result of training. And most importantly, program evaluations help document specific and tangible improvements in performance.

We hope that our experience will assist you as you design, follow-up and measure the results of your training programs. We are confident that if we work together to take the steps outlined in this overview, we will be able to demonstrate measurable improvements in the performance of your organization.

arrowbwd.jpg (1246 bytes)
Previous
Section
arrowfwd.jpg (1265 bytes)
Next
Section

Introduction

Measuring the
Effectiveness
of the Training
Process

Measuring
Participant
Behavioral
Changes

Measuring
Performance
Improvement

 

Return to Top of Page

 

Home || Corporate Overview || Training Systems Group || Sales Effectiveness Group || Government Services Group

 

Website Copyright © 1998-2007 by Sterling Institute, Inc.  All rights reserved.