Sterling Institute Logo Corporate Overview

sidebarblank.jpg (693 bytes)Search Our Site for Specific InformationSend an E-Mail to Sterling Institute

View Sterling Institute's Corporate Overview SectionView Sterling Institute's Training Systems Group SectionView Sterling Institute's Sales Effectiveness Group SectionView Sterling Institute's Government Services Group Section

What We Do

Over Thirty Years of Innovation

How We Can Help

Focused On Our Customers

Where We Fit in the Training & Development Marketplace

Core Competencies

Our Approach to Training and Development

Our Library of Training Programs

Corporate Headquarters

Distributors Wanted

Measurable Performance Improvement

Introduction

The challenge of demonstrating results through training and development is clearly a complex and time consuming one. In order to document change and evaluate the extent to which performance is improved, it is important to consider the role each phase of the training and development process plays in these efforts. Needs assessment, program design, implementation and evaluation need to be fully integrated for real learning and behavior change to occur back on the job. They represent important building blocks that must be in place for training to be truly effective.

It is our experience, that if certain actions are not taken during the program design and follow up phases of a training effort, then it is difficult, if not impossible, to ensure a payoff with training. Therefore, it may be helpful to review some of the steps that need to be taken to facilitate change on the job before summarizing some of the evaluation methods that can be used to measure the extent of that change.

In summary, there are five features of applied development programs that, when in place, facilitate the application of training on the job.

1. A top-down design helps gain senior management support for training and ensures that the improvement efforts of participants are directed toward the achievement of organizational goals;

2. A diagnostic program in which participants self-assess their current effectiveness stimulates them to identify improvement opportunities that they are committed to taking action on;

3. The setting of objectives and the development of action plans ensures that participants are prepared to take specific actions to improve performance when they return to work;

4. An integrated development effort that trains two or more levels within the organization ensures that participants and their supervisors have a common understanding of the skills and concepts presented and are prepared to work together to achieve common goals; and

5. A comprehensive follow-up strategy ensures that participants receive the ongoing support and guidance needed to implement their plans.

With these building blocks in place, it becomes possible to demonstrate the payoffs from training. To document results, a number of evaluation methods are available. In this overview, three ways in which program evaluations can help measure the effectiveness of training programs are summarized.

arrowbwd.jpg (1246 bytes)
Previous
Section
arrowfwd.jpg (1265 bytes)
Next
Section

Introduction

Measuring the
Effectiveness
of the Training
Process

Measuring
Participant
Behavioral
Changes

Measuring
Performance
Improvement

 

Return to Top of Page

 

Home || Corporate Overview || Training Systems Group || Sales Effectiveness Group || Government Services Group

 

Website Copyright © 1998-2007 by Sterling Institute, Inc.  All rights reserved.